Will California punish doctors for false COVID-19 information?

Quick Read

“In order for a patient to give informed consent, they have to be well informed,” Pan said.
A group called Physicians for Informed Consent filed a lawsuit against California’s medical board this month that says regulators are already “attempting to intimidate by investigation, censor and sanction physicians who publicly disagree with the government’s ever-evolving, erratic, and contradictory public health COVID-19 edicts.
” The bill also warns, “The spread of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines has weakened public confidence and placed lives at serious risk,” and spells out that doctors have “a duty to provide their patients with accurate, science-based information.
MedPage Today reported earlier this year that other states have attempted to limit the authority of medical boards to discipline doctors for spreading misinformation — or disinformation — about COVID-19.
Doctors who spread false information about COVID-19 could lose their license to practice medicine in California for “unprofessional conduct” under a bill passed this week by that state’s legislature.
California would become the first state in the nation to punish doctors for giving patients false or misleading information about COVID-19 risks, vaccinations and treatments if the bill is signed into law in the coming weeks by California Gov.
The bill leaves it up to the Medical Board of California to decide whether doctors’ interactions with patients — not their public statements — rise to the level of unprofessional conduct, and then to determine whether that merits revoking their medical license or taking other action, such as suspension.

Will California punish doctors for false COVID-19 information?

Doctors who spread false information about COVID-19 could lose their license to practice medicine in California for “unprofessional conduct” under a bill passed this week by that state’s legislature. California would become the first state in the nation to punish doctors for giving patients false or misleading information about COVID-19 risks, vaccinations and treatments if the bill is signed into law in the coming weeks by California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The bill leaves it up to the Medical Board of California to decide whether doctors’ interactions with patients — not their public statements — rise to the level of unprofessional conduct, and then to determine whether that merits revoking their medical license or taking other action, such as suspension. Specifically targeted in the bill is disinformation that “deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead,” as well as misinformation “that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.” The bill also warns, “The spread of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines has weakened public confidence and placed lives at serious risk,” and spells out that doctors have “a duty to provide their patients with accurate, science-based information.” A co-author of the bill, California state Sen. Richard Pan, a pediatrician described as supporting stronger vaccination requirements, told The New York Times the law was intended to address “the most egregious cases” of deliberately misleading patients. “In order for a patient to give informed consent, they have to be well informed,” Pan said. But the bill has also raised concerns about the free speech rights of doctors. MedPage Today reported earlier this year that other states have attempted to limit the authority of medical boards to discipline doctors for spreading misinformation — or disinformation — about COVID-19. A group called Physicians for Informed Consent filed a lawsuit against California’s medical board this month that says regulators are already “attempting to intimidate by investigation, censor and sanction physicians who publicly disagree with the government’s ever-evolving, erratic, and contradictory public health COVID-19 edicts.” Newsom has three weeks to take action on the bill but has not publicly taken a position on it, the Times reported.
The Original Article can be found on www.deseret.com

Minnesota fall 2022 COVID hospitalization and death predictions

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new COVID-19 Forecast Hub shows hospitalization and death predictions for Minnesota heading into the fall. The CDC’s forecast comp …

Read more here
Minnesota fall 2022 COVID hospitalization and death predictions

What long COVID looks like in kids

(NEXSTAR) – While it’s not clear exactly how many children suffer from long COVID, doctors who work with children are seeing some of them continue to struggle weeks or months after …

Read more here
What long COVID looks like in kids

COVID-19 boosters for Omicron variant available locally, in select locations

COVID-19 boosters targeting the BA.4 and BA.5 strains are now available across the Central Coast, but supply is limited. If you try to schedule a COVID-19 booster with CVS for exa …

Read more here
COVID-19 boosters for Omicron variant available locally, in select locations

News Scan for Sep 07, 2022

Vaccinated medical conference attendees had low rates of COVID-19 Today JAMA Network Open published a study showing a 1.8% COVID-19 infection rate among in-person attendees at a F …

Read more here
News Scan for Sep 07, 2022

Board debates business incentives, COVID

The late Betty Lynn was known to millions of “The Andy Griffith Show” fans as the long-suffering, sweet-hearted girlfriend of Deputy Barney Fife. Over the decades since the show l …

Read more here
Board debates business incentives, COVID